Evidence Solutions is a leading expert witness firm.
Virtual or in-person, we are dedicated to providing unparalleled expertise and professional guidance in legal matters.
We are knowledgeable, experienced and ready to serve you.
Meet our Team
Our Experts
James Bass
Digital Forensics
Robert Bennett
Accident Reconstruction
Daniel Brown
Law Enforcement
Craig Cherney
Real Estate
Scott Greene
Digital Evidence
Nancy Grugle, Ph.D., CHFP
Human Factors
George Jenson
Greek Fraternity
James E. Lewis
Transportation Safety
Robert Marcello, Ph.D., LCP, CCHP
Clinical Psychology
Jeff Martin
Digital Forensics
Brian Riker
Transportation Safety
John Ross
Commercial Trucking
Jeff Scurran
Sports & Fitness Safety
Todd M. Seger
Aviation
Sherry Young
Occupational Therapy
Thomas Shea, D.SC., CPP
Law Enforcement
Latest Articles
Exploring Inadequate Security in Premises Liability Cases
Exploring Inadequate Security in Premises Liability Cases
Inadequate Security cases arise when an individual suffers harm or death due to insufficient security measures on a property. These cases typically fall under the broader category of premises liability, which holds property owners and managers accountable for maintaining safe environments. When security measures are lacking or negligently implemented, and a person is harmed as a result, legal action can be taken to seek compensation for injuries and damages.
What is Inadequate Security?
Inadequate security refers to the failure to provide reasonable protective measures to prevent foreseeable harm. This can include various scenarios, such as insufficient lighting in parking lots, broken locks on doors, lack of security personnel, or malfunctioning surveillance cameras. The key issue is whether the property owner or manager could have reasonably anticipated the potential for harm and taken steps to prevent it.
The Concept of Premises Liability
Premises liability is a legal doctrine that holds property owners and occupiers responsible for accidents and injuries that occur on their property due to unsafe conditions. When it comes to inadequate security, premises liability ensures that property owners maintain a certain standard of care to prevent foreseeable harm from criminal acts.
Types of Inadequate Security Cases
Assault and Battery
There are various types of cases that may fall under the umbrella of Inadequate Security. Assault and Battery cases involve physical attacks that occur on properties where the owner failed to provide adequate security. Examples include assaults in poorly lit parking garages or apartment complexes without functioning security gates.
Robbery and Theft
Victims of robbery or theft may file inadequate security claims if the crime occurred due to lax security measures, such as broken entry points or a lack of security guards in high-risk areas.
Sexual Assault
Cases of sexual assault can arise in environments where security is insufficient, such as hotels, dormitories, or public facilities that lack proper surveillance and security personnel.
Workplace Violence
Employers may be held liable if they fail to provide adequate security measures to protect employees from violence, such as implementing proper security protocols or providing secure access to the workplace.
Legal Elements of Inadequate Security Cases
To succeed in an inadequate security case, the plaintiff must typically prove several key elements. The property owner or manager must have had a legal obligation to provide reasonable security measures, they specifically must have failed to meet this obligation, and that failure led directly to the plaintiff’s harm. There must be a demonstrably clear link between the inadequate security and the incident in question. Furthermore, the plaintiff must have experienced actual harm, whether that be physical injury, emotional distress, medical expenses, or lost wages.
The Role of a Law Enforcement or Security Expert
Proving inadequate security can be complex, but our Law Enforcement Expert Witnesses are here to help. Whether the incident occurred at a bar, event, workplace, or another venue, they can investigate and assess whether the harm suffered was foreseeable and/or due to a breach of duty to provide reasonable security measures. If such a breach occurred, our experts can determine why appropriate measures were not implemented to prevent the harm.
Inadequate security cases are crucial in holding property owners accountable for maintaining safe environments. By understanding the legal elements and challenges involved, attorneys can better navigate the complexities of these cases and seek the compensation their clients deserve. Do you have a case involving Inadequate Security? Reach out today for a consultation with our Law Enforcement Expert Witnesses by filling out our online form or by emailing the team at
Are Commercial Drivers Held to a Higher Standard of Care?
Are Commercial Drivers Held to a Higher Standard of Care?
In the context of legal proceedings, commercial drivers are indeed held to a higher standard of care than non-commercial drivers. This distinction is often debated in both plaintiff and defense cases, where plaintiff's counsel typically argues that commercial drivers should be held to more stringent standards, while defense attorneys seek to mitigate this heightened scrutiny.
"Standard of care" in the legal realm refers to the level of care and responsibility expected of individuals in various professions. This standard can be explicit, through written regulations, or implied through accepted practices within the industry. In many legal cases, a central question revolves around whether an individual met the standard of care required in their field—whether that individual is a driver, a doctor, or a law enforcement officer. This standard helps determine whether a party is liable for damages or if they are absolved from responsibility.
Commercial drivers are held to a higher standard than those operating private vehicles due to their professional responsibilities. This is reflected in several key regulations and practices that apply specifically to individuals holding a commercial driver's license (CDL). Below are several key points that underscore the higher standards imposed on commercial drivers:
- Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Standards: CDL holders are subject to a stricter BAC threshold of 0.04, compared to the typical 0.08 or 0.10 limit for non-commercial drivers. This lower BAC limit applies even when the driver operates their personal vehicle, as they may later drive a commercial vehicle.
- Drug and Alcohol Testing: CDL holders must undergo mandatory drug and alcohol testing. This includes pre-employment tests, random tests, post-accident tests, and tests based on reasonable suspicion. If a CDL holder is suspected of being under the influence, a test may be required to confirm or rule out impairment.
- Medical and Physical Requirements: Commercial drivers are required to maintain a valid Department of Transportation (DOT) physical examination. This examination includes rigorous assessments of blood pressure, heart rate, vision, hearing, and other physical capabilities. Drivers with medical conditions must be evaluated and certified annually by a medical professional to ensure they remain fit to drive.
- Training and Certification: Even experienced commercial drivers must undergo training whenever they change employers or roles. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) mandates that companies verify a driver's proficiency in 20 areas of operation, from vehicle inspections to handling adverse driving conditions and emergency maneuvers.
- Driver Qualification (DQ) File: CDL holders must have a comprehensive Driver Qualification (DQ) file maintained by their employer. This file includes detailed records such as a formal application, driving history, medical certifications, drug and alcohol test results, and traffic citations.
- Routine Inspections: Commercial vehicles are subject to regular and random inspections at weigh stations and roadside checkpoints. These inspections ensure compliance with safety standards, and non-compliance can result in a driver being placed out of service or facing legal consequences.
- Hours of Service Regulations: CDL holders are restricted by FMCSA regulations on the number of hours they can drive. Over-the-road drivers are allowed to drive for a maximum of 11 hours per day within a 14-hour window and then must rest for at least 10 hours before continuing. Additionally, drivers are limited to 70 hours of driving per week.
- Endorsements and Special Conditions: Certain endorsements, such as those for transporting hazardous materials (HAZMAT), impose additional restrictions. Drivers carrying hazardous materials, for instance, must stop at all railroad crossings and adhere to specific parking and routing rules. Non-commercial drivers carrying hazardous materials do not face the same requirements.
- Air Brake Systems: Commercial vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) over 26,000 pounds require the driver to possess a CDL with an air brake endorsement. This is in contrast to non-commercial drivers who may operate vehicles with air brakes without the need for a CDL or additional endorsement.
- Broader Definition of Commercial Vehicles: The term "commercial vehicle" extends beyond large trucks. According to the American Society of Safety Professionals (ASSP) and the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), a commercial vehicle is defined as any vehicle used for business purposes, whether owned, leased, or rented by an organization. This includes vehicles like service vans, delivery trucks, and even company cars, all of which are subject to higher standards of care.
- Law Enforcement Authority: Commercial drivers are also subject to a greater degree of scrutiny by law enforcement. During routine traffic stops, officers have the authority to inspect a driver's documentation, including their license, registration, permits, and hours-of-service logs. This level of scrutiny is not typically applied to non-commercial drivers.
- Insurance Requirements for Commercial Drivers: Drivers who use their personal vehicles for commercial purposes, such as those working for Uber, Lyft, or delivery services like DoorDash must maintain specialized insurance coverage. This commercial insurance is distinct from personal auto insurance and ensures that the vehicle is covered during business-related activities.
In summary, commercial drivers are indeed held to a higher standard of care than non-commercial drivers. This heightened responsibility is enforced through a complex set of regulations designed to ensure public safety and minimize risks associated with operating large or business-related vehicles. The consequences of failing to meet these standards can be severe, including penalties, loss of employment, or liability for damages in the event of an accident.
Do you have a case involving a Commercial Vehicle collision? Reach out today by filling out our contact form, emailing the team at
Liability in Sports Injuries: Insights for Legal Professionals
Liability in Sports Injuries: Insights for Legal Professionals
The legal landscape surrounding sports injuries is complex and multifaceted. For attorneys navigating cases involving injuries in recreational, school, or professional sports, it’s essential to grasp the nuances of liability. This article will outline who can be held liable for sports injuries and the factors influencing these determinations.
Key Players in Sports Injury Liability
Liability for sports injuries can be attributed to several parties, each of which may bear responsibility depending on the circumstances surrounding the injury. Understanding these parties is critical:
- Coaches and Trainers: Coaches have a duty of care to ensure the safety of their athletes. These duties include proper instruction, monitoring physical conditioning, and enforcing safety protocols. If a coach fails to provide adequate supervision or ignores safety guidelines, they may be found negligent. Additionally, trainers who fail to recognize or appropriately respond to injuries can be held liable.
- Schools and Athletic Programs: Educational institutions can be held liable under the principle of vicarious liability for the actions of their employees, including coaches and trainers. Schools must implement adequate safety measures, maintain equipment, and follow established protocols for injury management. Failure to do so can expose them to lawsuits, particularly if the injury results from negligence.
- Sporting Organizations: Amateur and professional leagues, as well as governing bodies, have a responsibility to establish safety standards and protocols for their sports. If an organization is found to have inadequate safety measures or fails to enforce rules that protect athletes, it may be held liable for injuries resulting from these oversights.
- Other Participants: Athletes can sometimes be held liable for injuries inflicted on others during play. This can include reckless behavior or violations of the sport’s rules. Understanding the concept of “assumption of risk” is vital here; participants often assume certain risks when engaging in sports, but actions that go beyond typical play may lead to liability.
- Facility Owners: The owners of sports facilities can also bear liability if unsafe conditions contribute to an injury. This includes maintaining safe playing surfaces, ensuring proper lighting, and providing adequate first aid resources. An Expert Witness can evaluate the condition of the facility and any potential negligence on the part of its owners.
- Equipment Manufacturers: Defective or unsafe equipment can be a significant factor in sports injuries. If an injury results from equipment failure or design flaws, manufacturers may be held liable under product liability laws. Consideration should be given as to whether the equipment was used correctly and whether it met safety standards.
Factors Influencing Liability Determinations
When assessing liability in sports injuries, several factors come into play:
- Negligence: Establishing negligence involves demonstrating that a party failed to act as a reasonable person would under similar circumstances. This can include inadequate training, poor facility maintenance, or failure to enforce safety rules.
- Assumption of Risk: Participants often assume certain risks inherent to sports. This legal doctrine can complicate liability cases, as it may limit recovery for injuries sustained during normal play. However, if a player is injured due to gross negligence or misconduct, they may still have grounds for a lawsuit.
- Informed Consent: Schools and organizations must ensure that athletes (and their guardians, in the case of minors) are informed about the risks associated with participation. Proper consent forms can provide some protection against liability, but they must adequately disclose potential hazards.
- Comparative Fault: In some jurisdictions, comparative fault laws allow for the allocation of liability among multiple parties. This means that an injured party’s own negligence may reduce their recovery, depending on their percentage of fault in the incident.
Best Practices for Risk Mitigation
To minimize the potential for liability, schools, organizations, and coaches should adopt the following best practices:
- Regular Safety Training: Conduct ongoing safety education for coaches, athletes, and staff to promote awareness of injury prevention and response protocols.
- Maintain Safe Facilities: Regularly inspect and maintain facilities and equipment to ensure they meet safety standards.
- Establish Clear Policies: Develop and enforce clear safety policies and procedures, including emergency action plans for injuries.
- Documentation: Keep thorough records of training, safety protocols, and incident reports to demonstrate adherence to safety standards.
Conclusion
The realm of liability in sports injuries is intricate and requires careful navigation by legal professionals. Involving an expert early on is key to identifying all those liable in a sports and fitness injury case. By understanding the various parties that can be held liable and the factors influencing liability determinations, attorneys can more effectively represent their clients, whether they are injured athletes, schools, or sporting organizations. Emphasizing safety and proactive risk management not only protects athletes but also helps mitigate legal exposure for all involved in sports.
Do you have a case involving Sports and Fitness Injury? Reach out today for a consultation on how our Expert Witness can support your case.
Proving Cohabitation with Digital Evidence
Proving Cohabitation with Digital Evidence
In legal terms, cohabitation refers to two individuals living together in a romantic or spouse-like relationship without formal marriage. Different states apply varied legal definitions of cohabitation, which often impact issues like spousal support, alimony, and sometimes even child custody arrangements. In some states, cohabitation can significantly affect an ex-spouse's obligation to pay alimony, as courts may terminate or adjust support if cohabitation is proven. Other states may have different criteria, so knowing the local legal framework is crucial.
Key Conditions for Alimony Adjustment
Several conditions can lead to the termination or reduction of alimony payments. These often include:
- Death of the Alimony Recipient: Alimony obligations cease upon the death of one of the parties.
- Remarriage of the Alimony Recipient: Remarriage of the recipient typically ends the requirement to pay alimony.
- Cohabitation of the Recipient: Living in a spouse-like relationship without marriage can qualify as grounds for terminating or adjusting alimony in some jurisdictions.
Each of these conditions can result in a legal case to revisit or end alimony obligations, with cohabitation often proving the most challenging to confirm.
The Legal Challenge of Proving Cohabitation
Determining whether someone is cohabiting requires proof that meets a court’s criteria. Proof generally requires evidence of a spouse-like relationship between the recipient and their partner which may involve showing that the couple shares a home, is romantically involved, and combines financial responsibilities.
Factors That Courts Consider in Cohabitation Cases
Common factors that courts evaluate include:
- Shared residence and consistent time spent together
- Romantic or intimate relationship
- Shared expenses or financial dependence
- Duration of living arrangements
- Shared responsibilities, such as parenting duties or home maintenance
Digital Evidence Used to Prove Cohabitation
Digital Evidence can be used to prove cohabitation in several different ways and may be especially useful when the parties are attempting to conceal more traditional methods of proof such as joint utility bills or shared vehicle ownership.
Triangulation
Cell phone records can provide a detailed history of which cell towers a device has connected to over time, allowing for a rich illustration of someone's day-to-day life. If a person claims residence across town but consistently connects to a cell tower in another location every night, this will raise questions about where they truly reside. This data can help investigators challenge assertions about a person’s place of residence or establish other factors such as shared parental duties (consistent drop-offs/pick-ups at various locations).
WiFi Usage
In cases where mobile devices can be acquired, an analysis of WiFi usage can prove where the phone spends its time. Connecting to WiFi networks creates a timestamp of not only where but also when the network was accessed. If two cell phones are regularly accessing the same home WiFI, it can suggest that the individuals either live or frequently spend time together.
Other GPS Data
Cell phones contain more GPS data now than ever before, and many applications store it in unexpected places like fitness apps, photos, and videos. The GPS data from these applications can log precise locations, if two devices consistently share overlapping GPS data, this can be a strong indicator of cohabitation.
Social Media
Frequent photos taken together and shared posts that indicate joint vacations, celebrations, or events can indicate ongoing cohabitation. Social media evidence can also provide location and time-stamped data that places two individuals in the same location at the same time, further indicating possible cohabitation.
Private Investigators
A private investigator may be involved to handle more on-the-ground pursuits, such as surveilling the suspected pair, looking through trash, or gathering statements from witnesses who may have insights into their routines.
Presenting Cohabitation Evidence in Court
Once all evidence is gathered, findings are compiled into a comprehensive report for the court. Each piece of evidence—whether surveillance footage, social media data, or cell tower triangulation—supports the claim of a spouse-like relationship. The goal is to establish a clear, coherent picture of cohabitation that meets the legal standards of the court.
Conclusion
Proving cohabitation is an intricate process and only the court can ultimately determine whether alimony should be adjusted or terminated. For individuals seeking to modify alimony based on cohabitation, it is essential to gather irrefutable evidence of a spouse-like relationship. A thorough investigation, including an analysis of available digital evidence, can empower the court to make a well-informed decision.
Testimonials
What Our Clients Say
We hired Evidence Solutions on a very contentious DRAM shop / premises case. We had always suspected that Defendants' manipulated certain drink records. It was not until we were able to demonstrate that without full disclosure of the underlying data,...
Jeff Martin, you just gave a perfect deposition. Ten stars. Thank you for lending your expertise and for being such a professional!
Your investigation of this matter has proven itself to be invaluable. I do not believe we would have been able to discern the identity of the culprit who hacked into Mr. Benchley's e-mail account but for your efforts.
Your effective testimony and your willingness to work with us to assist in our understanding of the dynamics of this accident was crucial in our successful prosecution of the claim. I hope there will be an opportunity for us to work together again in...
In the evolving field of digital forensics and electronic discovery, Scott Greene is the go-to guy. He and his team at Evidence Solutions understand the importance of electronic information. They find it. They preserve it, and they have the qualifica...
Just a note to express my deep appreciation for the superb work and high level of professionalism which you brought to our case.
I used Evidence Solutions to comply with a discovery request, and I couldn't have been more pleased with their service. Evidence Solutions gave me everything I asked for in an easy-to-retrieve format and in a timely manner. Thank you, Evidence Soluti...
Your investigation of this matter has proven itself to be invaluable. I do not believe we would have been able to discern the identity of the culprit who hacked into Mr. Benchley's e-mail account but for your efforts.
Having practiced law for over 40 years, it is truly enjoyable to have an expert that is a real person in and out of the courtroom. We just resolved the case, and you were a great part of our success. It’s not often that I get to interact with such a ...
ESI brings to the table an outstanding and comprehensive understanding of big rig truck operations, yard protocols, loading procedures, including nearly everything having to do with the operation, logistics, and related matters concerning big rig tru...
Thanks for all your efforts in this case. I think the jury was impressed with your discovery and I have to give you the credit. It's been a pleasure working with you.
We retained Jeff Martin for a complex computer fraud case, and he provided invaluable assistance. Jeff educated us on the technical issues, explained unfamiliar concepts in a clear and understandable way, and guided us on the investigative steps to t...
Thank you again for speaking to our class. You have a natural way of explaining complex technical issues to people like me who don’t understand technology well, which is probably why you are so good at your job. And it’s funny because the talk always...
I must tell you the settlement of this case is due to in significant part, to your outstanding contributions as an expert in aid of this trial. Thank you for your willingness to work with out office on this matter. I look forward to having an opportu...
Your trucking expert did a masterful job on this matter, particularly with regard to his deposition. In fact, the Defense Counsel commented on his memory and ability to recall specific facts. He was exceptionally well prepared and did an excellent jo...
I wanted to take this opportunity to thank you for your assistance in the above-referenced case. As you will remember, this was a very large drug smuggling case involving a vehicle hauler. You were able to provide me the “education” I needed in the v...
You were very helpful to me. I feel fortunate that you agreed to take the case. I will mention your name to other attorneys should they need your type of Services. Thank you.
Scott and his Evidence Solutions team were a pleasure to work with. Attentive every step of the way. I don’t know what I would have done without them. I will definitely call them again in the future.
I am pleased to report that the above captioned matter has resolved. Thank for the very professional way in which you were of help to me in this case. Be assured that will be thinking of you for future cases.
Evidence Solutions performed iPhone forensics for me related to my divorce. They were extremely thorough and the data was easy to interpret. Their services made me feel confident in a crucial decision I had to make in my personal life and I am foreve...