In the context of litigation involving commercial transportation companies, the hiring practices of these companies can become a focal point, particularly when federal regulations are at issue. A company's hiring practices can be critically relevant in cases where they have potentially failed to meet the standards required by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA).
The Legal Significance of Hiring Practices
When litigating cases involving commercial drivers, particularly those engaged in interstate commerce, it is essential to examine the hiring practices of the company that employed the driver in question. The FMCSA mandates that employers conduct thorough pre-hire investigations and ongoing annual assessments to confirm the qualifications of their commercial drivers. Failure to adhere to these federal requirements can establish grounds for claims of negligence.
Key records used to comply with FMCSA requirements include the Pre-employment Screening Program (PSP) report, driver license abstracts, and inquiries with previous employers regarding safety performance and drug and alcohol testing. The FMCSA's Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse must also be queried prior to permitting a newly hired driver to operate a vehicle requiring a commercial driver's license (CDL) to ensure they are not in prohibited status. These regulations are not merely procedural; they form the backbone of a company's duty of care in ensuring the safety of their operations and, by extension, the public.
Implications of Non-Compliance in Litigation
For attorneys, the success or failure of a transportation company to comply with these federal regulations can be a powerful tool in establishing or refuting negligence. If a company neglects to perform the necessary background checks or ignores the results of such checks, they may be held liable for the actions of their drivers. Courts have consistently recognized that inadequate hiring practices, particularly those that overlook federal mandates, can be grounds for significant liability. Large verdicts have been awarded in cases where companies failed to adhere to their own policies or did not meet the FMCSA's standards, leading to catastrophic accidents.
Assessing the Qualifications of Commercial Drivers
In litigation, the qualifications and background of a driver are not just relevant; they are critical. An expert witness in this area can provide invaluable testimony on whether a company's hiring practices met the required federal standards. Insurance companies, for instance, base premiums on the assessed risk of a company's drivers. By failing to screen out high-risk drivers, a company not only increases its insurance costs but also exposes itself to greater liability in the event of an accident.
Beyond insurance implications, there are civil liabilities associated with negligent hiring. An expert witness can articulate how a company's failure to comply with FMCSA regulations constitutes a breach of the standard of care owed to the public.
The Role of Background Investigations
A thorough background investigation is not just an industry best practice; it is often a contractual and regulatory requirement. This includes criminal history checks, which are particularly relevant in cases where employees interact with the public unsupervised. The failure to conduct these investigations, or to act on the findings, can lead to claims of negligent hiring, particularly if the employee has a history that should have disqualified them from the position.
Moreover, when a candidate's background includes issues such as previous convictions or outstanding civil actions, an expert witness can explain how these factors should have been weighed in the hiring decision. The use of national background screening services can uncover information that a company might otherwise miss, particularly when dealing with candidates who have moved from another state.
Evaluating Second Chances in Employment
While second chances are important, they do not absolve a company of its legal responsibilities. An expert witness can provide testimony on the nuances of giving a candidate with a criminal history a second chance, while still adhering to the standards required by law. This includes evaluating the recency and severity of the offenses and ensuring that any employment decision is in compliance with applicable regulations.
For attorneys representing plaintiffs or defendants in cases involving commercial drivers, understanding and demonstrating the relevance of a company's hiring practices is crucial. The FMCSA's regulations provide a clear framework for what is expected of employers in this industry. Failure to meet these standards can establish negligence and significantly impact the outcome of a case. Expert testimony on these matters can be decisive in litigation, providing clarity on the duties owed by companies to ensure the safety of their operations and the public.
Are hiring practices an aspect of your trucking case? Reach out to ESI today!
